At the moment when the U.S. government thinks in terms of Yalta and wishes to draw new spheres of influence, it is a crime of omission for Russian diplomacy to accept Ukraine's accession to the EU, while limiting itself to rejecting Ukrainian accession to NATO.
The distinction between NATO and the EU is of no significance, as Article 42.7 of the EU treaty carries the same weight as Article 5 of the NATO treaty. It guarantees mutual defense assistance to member states in the event of an external threat.
If Russia accepts Ukraine's accession to
the EU, it undermines one of the key conditions for signing a lasting peace:
Ukrainian neutrality. Ukraine’s accession to the EU means political alignment
with the Euro-Atlantic empire, thus representing an indirect eastward expansion
of NATO.
The EU and NATO are complementary
organizations and, in many cases, operate identically.
The diplomatic folly uttered by the
Kremlin—that it is Ukraine's sovereign right to join the EU but not
NATO—weakens the argument against NATO membership. The Ukrainian leadership
would respond that since it is their sovereign right to join the EU, the same
applies to NATO.
At this point, the best approach is the
dismemberment of the EU and its fragmentation into five spheres of influence:
an Anglo-Saxon zone in Northwestern Europe, a Franco-German zone in Central
Europe, a neutral Polish-Hungarian-Czech-Slovak zone, a Russian zone in
Northeastern Europe, and a Balkan sphere of influence where Greece could play a
leading role.
Now that the U.S. government is clearly
showing its aversion to the EU and NATO, it is a unique opportunity for these
criminal organizations, which have caused so much suffering to humanity, to be
dissolved.
If Russian diplomacy makes the criminal mistake of supporting the EU by accepting Ukraine's accession, it might not get a second chance. In the next historical cycle, the dissolution of the EU will not be discussed, but rather the dissolution of the Russian Federation.
No comments:
Post a Comment